Overview of Audit of Public Sector Undertakings
10 theoretical questions from ICAI Study Material
Download original PDFAnswer:
Answer not available in source PDF.
Answer:
Factors to be considered while planning the Performance Audit: Refer Para 6.2.
Answer:
Answer not available in source PDF.
Answer:
Answer not available in source PDF.
Answer:
Section 2(45) of the Companies Act, 2013, defines a “Government Company” as a company in which not less than 51% of the paid-up share capital is held by the Central Government or by any State Government or Governments or partly by the Central Government and partly by one or more State Governments, and includes a company which is a subsidiary company of such a Government company. The auditors of these government companies are firms of Chartered Accountants, appointed by the Comptroller & Auditor General, who gives the auditor directions on the manner in which the audit should be conducted by them. The listing of company’s shares on a stock exchange is irrelevant for this purpose and hence Sam’s opinion is not correct.
Answer:
Answer not available in source PDF.
Answer:
In the given scenario, C&AG appointed Verma & Associates, a chartered accountant firm, to conduct Performance Audit of MAP Ltd., a PSU of Government of India. The firm conducted audit with a view to check all the expenses of the unit are in conformity to the public interest and publicly accepted customs which is not Performance Audit. A performance audit is an objective and systematic examination of evidence for the purpose of providing an independent assessment of the performance of a government organization, program, activity, or function in order to provide information to improve public accountability OVERVIEW OF AUDIT OF PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKING and facilitate decision-making by parties with responsibility to oversee or initiate corrective action. Performance audit in PSUs is conducted by the C&AG (Supreme Audit Institutions) through various subordinate offices of Indian Audit and Accounts Department (IAAD). In conducting performance audit, the subordinate offices are guided by manual and auditing standards prescribed by C&AG. Therefore, the objectives of performance auditing are evaluation of economy, efficiency, and effectiveness of policy, programmes, organization and management. It also promotes accountability by assisting those charged with governance and oversight responsibilities to improve performance; and transparency by affording taxpayers, those targeted by government policies and other stakeholders an insight into the management and outcomes of different government activities. Performance auditing focuses on areas in which it can add value which have the greatest potential for development. It provides constructive incentives for the responsible parties to take appropriate action. Regulations on Audit and Accounts issued by C&AG lay down that the responsibility for the development of measurable objectives and performance indicators as also the systems of measurement rests with the Government departments or Heads of entities. They are also required to define intermediate and final outputs and outcomes in measurable and monitorable terms, standardise the unit cost of delivery and benchmark quality of outputs and outcomes. Thus, rejection of audit report (submitted by audit firm) by C&AG is in order as audit with a view to mere check all the expenses of the unit are in conformity to the public interest and publicly accepted customs done by audit firm is not performance audit in all aspects.
Answer:
In the given scenario, in view of the objectives discussed, performance audit is being referred. Refer Para 6.2.
Answer:
In the given case, it is a “Compliance Audit” performed by Office of Comptroller & Auditor General of India. Compliance audit is the independent assessment of whether a given subject matter is in compliance with the applicable criteria. This audit is carried out by assessing whether activities, financial transactions and information comply in all material respects with the regulatory and other rules which govern the audited entity. Compliance auditing is concerned with: - (a) Regularity- adherence of the subject matter to the formal criteria emanating from relevant laws, regulations, and agreements applicable to the entity. (b) Propriety- observance of the general principles governing sound financial management and the ethical conduct of public officials. While regularity is emphasized in compliance auditing, propriety is equally pertinent in the public sector context, in which there are certain expectations concerning financial management and the conduct of officials. Under Article 151, audit reports of the C&AG relating to the accounts of the Central/ State Government should be submitted to the President/Governor of the State who shall cause them to be laid before Parliament/State Legislative Assemblies. In the given situation, the report relates to the State Department. Therefore, report was likely to have been submitted to Governor of state to be laid before State legislative assembly.
Answer:
The likely objectives of performance audit to be conducted by office of C & AG of India of some selected social security pension schemes and scholarship schemes in a state could be: - • Whether proper planning and process were in place to capture data of beneficiaries under above schemes • Whether necessary steps were taken for implementation of DBT like preventing delay in payments to the intended beneficiaries and pilferage and duplication • Whether the infrastructure, organization and management of DBT were adequate and effective. “Audit criteria” are standards used to determine whether a programme meets or exceeds expectations. It provides a context for understanding the results of the audit. Audit criteria are reasonable and attainable standards of performance against which economy, efficiency and effectiveness of programmes and activities can be assessed. In the above situation, various documents issued by Government of India and state government like circulars, instructions, Standard operating procedure manuals, guidelines of schemes on identification and authentication of beneficiaries etc, general management and subject matter literature can be used to determine “audit criteria”.